2011
from the 2nd. to the 3rd. of June, 1902. It is easily conceivable that the witness Ng Sze Ko may have made a mistake of two days in fixing the date of an occurrence which took place so long ago.
For the rest Captain Pulford asserts that the deduction alleged to have been made at the paying off of the Firesen could not have been made as he makes a practice of attending when his crew is paid off.
I submit that the mere presence of the Captain, unless he happened to thoroughly understand the Chinese language, is no guarantee that the deduction was not made. Mr. Guterres it must be remembered has a thorough knowledge of Chinese colloquial, and it is easy to understand that unless the crew or some of them made an appeal to the Captain in a language he could understand the transaction could be effected under his nose without his becoming aware of what was transpiring.
# Paragraph 11.
The Petitioner's answer to charge (b) cannot be regarded as satisfactory. Mr. Guterres states that on the afternoon of the 10th. of November Le to Cheuk Mu to "come back on Monday and "bring with him the Boarding Master (i.e. the Boarding House Master) "who shipped him". Now Cheuk Mu went to the Shipping Office with Ng Ying-sing (page 12 of transcript of evidence) who is the Boarding House Master who shipped him (page 21), and Cheuk Mu stated (page 14) that when he presented his wages account to Mr. Guterres on his second visit to the Shipping Office Mr. Guterres told him "you must get Sai Yaw to come here before that can be paid". On page 14 in answer to a question by the Treasurer Mr. Guterres admitted that he told Cheuk Mu to come back with Sai Yau, it will be remembered that Sai Yau is the person to whom Cheuk Mu handed his wages account on his first visit to the Shipping Office (page 13). Sai Yau stated that the deduction of $20 would be made. It is to be noted that Inspector Hanson gave evidence (page 29) to the effect that Sai Yau had suddenly left the Colony when he
០៥៩:
2011
PURCION
demos tenicio ci to ZATEMN
ས
My
:::
* dartsened
J}
„TURISMO V Lifts cat is nomeneng ati ar tur istuct WIJLOA
•1!42982??
4
10 JS1 LMIAT
*
AJ UNE CA
le
-Dad & 30.
"
JEPOTA 1300 (1) A
oda nima 110 dues of verdoeng
نا
1
360
from the 2nd. to the 3rd. of June, 1902. It is easily conceivable that
the witness Ng Sze Ko may have made a mistake of two days in fixing
the date of an occurrence which took place so long ago.
For the rest Captain Pulford asserts that the
deduction alleged to have been made at the paying off of the Firesen
coull not have been rade as he makes a practice of attending when his
crew is paid off.
I submit that the aere presence of the
Captain, unless be happened to thoroughly understand the Chinese
language, is no guarantee that the deduction was not rale. Mr. Guterres
it aust be remembered has a thorough knowledge of Chinese colloquial,
and it is easy to understand that unless the crew or some of then made
an appeal to the Captain in a language he could understand the trans-
-action could be effected under his nose without his becoming aware of
what was transpiring.
JOJ CIDA L:
BP EMOCE (idoinde Ion P!
"
1. 1,
.(o)
JUN 2
Il
ROTLIV
2A JA & 7799JUE
.T 1.
LAU RANTAJLA
ནཱ་་
aid at der aroduct at onl80 (47%
V DOWLAN 1314 HOANG 41 20 JeLLO EMJ Mä
JP JER we play Juni 2011
instrangi uni wartettenCS
sily A 16. i
:{
JP 2018 1 12 Au
LFNODI
J:
#tourJE 1STE URG AF AGORANS
10 Jnoiture edu to admitte
Ci 1 a TEVISADE 2. BUT JAI 1 LOT on 30 Liga MENJ apro MJ 10 edert mid 3000
tot t
„of dermened!
* drid tear: Jaesar will includ
Paragraph 11.
The Petitioner's answer to charge (b) cannot
co
be regarded as satisfactory, Mr. Guterres states that on the afternoon
of the 10th. of November Le to13 Cheux #u to "come back on Monday and
"bring with him the boarding Master (1.e. the Boarding House Yaster)
"who shipped hin". Now Cheuk fu went to the Shipping Office with Ng
Ying-sing (page 12 of transcript of evidence) who is the Boarding
House Master who shipped his (page 21), and Cheuk Mu stated (page 14)
that when he presented his wages account to Mr. Guterres on his second
visit to the Shipping office Mr. Guterres told bin you must get Sai
Yaw to come here before that can be paid". Un page 14 in answer to a
question by the Treasurer Wr. Guterres admitted that he told Cheux Pu
to come back with Sai Yau, it will be remembered that Sai Yau is the
person to whom Cheuk u handed his wages account on his first visit to
the Shipping Office (page 13).hope Sai Yau stated that the deduction of
$20 would be rale. It is to be noted that Inspector Hanson gave evidence
(page 29) to the effect that Sai Yau had suddenly left the Colony when
he
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.